Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.51.0302042334020.24156@panix3.panix.com>
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
To: Cyb <cybermind@listserv.aol.com>,
"WRYTING-L : Writing and Theory across Disciplines" <WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA>
Subject:
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 23:34:28 -0500 (EST)
i high say, quality can't possibly work. keep it up don't have high quality say, of my work. possibly don't have new ideas all the time. my style, soon new ideas, identify all style, time. i've failed. ... soon feel failed accomplished how something, can failed soon myself. as how i done quality. anything some at of with texts such are poor i quality. have some done texts all are with better worse. than some others just and seem worse. fillers just better seem than to others be and fillers some repetitions. nine demand of staleness daily after some nine seem years to daily repetitions. writing. gets if lost is the brilliant rest it of gets the lost sludge. in writing. rest anything sludge. it you're you're reading still this? reading still well, well, infinite got reading infinite this? errors this regrets. ... this sounds different by regrets, if even sondheim. it's someone not pretending even to alan sondheim. a person or friend over or there. a relative. look it's that even person over there. his did name all. it's 'jennifer' i bet. he'd look, a bad sign and his name is 'jennifer' all. who else. ... would trying else. out he's whether trying to figure that out would whether be justify be mess. mess justifies mess. mess mess. both would senses of justify, he'll thinks. of he'll mess do and it! both ... ===