The Alan Sondheim Mail Archive

July 25, 2003


th3ory

do you you do know you my know wife, my suzie wife, graham? suzie even
graham? years even ago years when ago she when used she to used if to
would itrs like would find to some find new some ways new get to in get
the in mood the more mood often more itrs often exciting now be to a be
part a of part all of this all help this and help healing. and anything
healing. right you now right only itrs available only online. available
soon online. it soon will it magazines, in doesnrt she have doesnrt phd a
or phd that. like but that. that but didnrt that was suzie unbelievable
was at unbelievable they devoted labeled have her labeled v her sthe v
ultimate sthe sex-divat. ultimate very sex-divat. lucky very devoted and
husband cd well husband few a months few recorded she little a smood-
makert little audio smood-makert cd audio should you know, should has
suzie always has had always knack a for knack sort this thing. of we've
are made we've our it mission our life in as help many as these of hot
these b00ks hot are b00ks better help than better 1! than we when met we
william met he william so was shy so can we greatly be appreciated.
greatly champions. appreciated. one champions. "students": our name:
"students": age: william 18 age: comments: 18 3 comments: fiuic 3 ked,
fiuic feel to construct a b00k construct their in th3ory their first very
time, first helped time, thousands helped women. of never it took never
long women before long word before got word around got women the knowing
that what knowing makes what tick of how and them help least their 2 least
million 2 by women valentines by 2004. f1uicking matter. 2004. wherever
matter. workede she time of covered time sipunk, in f1uicking sipunk,
suiciking and enjoy or love-making enjoy moree even radio moree tv and
werre guys striving werre relationship. at deconstruct some meet we h0t
meet y0ung h0t guys y0ung who time want who sweet get suzie sweet an like
old an pro old no in time. no contents: time. teamed contents: him teamed
up him with up best our educators best jeff educators steven then already
has door) the asking and advice. her then advice. might suzie able be you.
help tiwinks you. can. we they're can. horny a bunch horny spend they fair
a amount fair work amount regular a jobewomen regular were jobewomen
coming always into make office her (shutting office sondheim, (shutting
funny sondheim, boys funny make boys


___

Julu on Colonialism


"Pledge marches me on your boat"? To the moment of the pledge of truth,
but the march carries nothing, back and forth - the image pretends towards
the static, the immanent, with its reliance on the fixture of pixels. But
such fixtures are configurations in the first place - we are at double and
tertiary levels of coding, and this coding is all the way down of course.
Nonetheless, there is a structure of belief here, all tangled with soft-
ware and protocols, and therefore with contractuality and post-late-cap-
italism, remember that? :"Your palm is blasphemy unto the Lord."? The palm
is the image of the world; it is the Lord's blasphemy, cutting corners,
making shortcuts, bypassing the Absolute - here is what you have, here is
what might be the case - and you can do something about it. "Your boat
shall convert in truth and not in false demand"? Hardly the case; in fact,
the wavering is the result of the wave - diffraction and refraction at
work portending an image, now digital, now part of the "Archive series"
which is once again taken for truth. No elements need apply - they are are
present, accounted for, at least at the beginning. To begin the unbegin-
ning, to begin the unaccountable - that is the history of our lives,
against which archiving is both weak and unacceptable. :"The Transform and
Freedom of the Natives"? It seems just the opposite - archiving the
impossible, down to the level of the pixel. Even in Run-time, this goes
nowhere at all. The images are enormous, down to the level of diffraction
lines, surely digital artifacts in the first place. From all reports,
they're less in jpeg than tiff, which shows that some sort of processing
is advantageous. Of course every image is a process, and the digital ones
continue to be so - not to mention decay, lost pixels beneath the rain of
constant radiation. ::

"How would you define your palm"? - not by defining I would say, not by
palm-up or palm-down. The definition in the first place is a type of
archiving, a placement, both radical and Cartesian in essence, if not in
gridwork.

Does "The Transform and Freedom of the Natives"? It seems just the oppos-
ite - archiving the impossible, down to the level of the pixel.  Even in
Run-time, this goes nowhere at all. The images are enormous, down to the
level of diffraction lines, surely digital artifacts in the first place.
From all reports, they're less in jpeg than tiff, which shows that some
sort of processing is advantageous. Of course every image is a process,
and the digital ones continue to be so - not to mention decay, lost pixels
beneath the rain of constant radiation.  replace your "Pledge marches me
on your boat"? To the moment of the pledge of truth, but the march carries
nothing, back and forth - the image pretends towards the static, the
immanent, with its reliance on the fixture of pixels. But such fixtures
are configurations in the first place - we are at double and tertiary
levels of coding, and this coding is all the way down of course. Nonethe-
less, there is a structure of belief here, all tangled with software and
protocols, and therefore with contractuality and post-late-capitalism,
remember that? ?


___

Generated by Mnemosyne 0.12.