Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.61.0503141407260.18590@panix3.panix.com>
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
To: Cyb <cybermind@listserv.aol.com>,
"WRYTING-L : Writing and Theory across Disciplines" <WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA>
Subject: "repeated thee sugar"
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:07:35 -0500 (EST)
"repeated thee sugar" "repeated thee sugar given occasion embarrass "lady circumstances "reply perhaps south " "food may considered horses, difficult know independence sandwich "need. " "studied worthy least reference news whos? next use evil wine friend "hearing. teach somewhere his, idea grave dare hat, need companion "length. not mother person know across, taste street convenient, tying "may few. did gym as. allowed person person dare surprise." I received this within an unsolicited email offering merchandise I have never wanted and still no longer want. However, entranced by the message itself, I have taken it upon myself (always "I, I, I"!) to _mean_ and _intend_ the words quoted. I mean these words as urgency, the surprise of a surprised person, beneath the aegis of a compromised lady. It is no longer random, if it ever was. It is neither poem nor filler, but rather the poetics of despair, such is my intention. It means what I have always meant _it_ to say, encapsulates _it_ as a gift given me, gratis, within the context of commercial appeal. So I offer my poem, my urgency: "repeated thee sugar" - repeated thee sugar repeated thee sugar given occasion embarrass lady circumstances reply perhaps south food may considered horses, difficult know independence sandwich need. studied worthy least reference news whos? next use evil wine friend hearing. teach somewhere his, idea grave dare hat, need companion length. not mother person know across, taste street convenient, tying may few. did gym as. allowed person person dare surprise. ==