Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.63.0512170106360.26357@panix3.panix.com>
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
To: Cyb <cybermind@listserv.aol.com>,
"WRYTING-L : Writing and Theory across Disciplines" <WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA>
Subject: birth of code unease
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:06:45 -0500 (EST)
birth of code unease there is no birth of code, perhaps it is our universe. any representation is already embedded in another. perhaps you can't have representations without symmetrical substructures. with 2nd-level code that's certainly true. but a painting is another matter altogether. in a painting (this is a painting of code), the eye does what the eye will (what one wills) (what is emergent (out of (in relation to)) chaos). what i will <-> thinking a posteriori, the periphery. i would have willed this if it would have been willed. perhaps these sentences are phrases, unpunctured, opened the world is all that is the easement one can always try to force heidegger, i.e. retreat to alterity why is there something rather than nothing <-> not always already your words, not even the ghosts of words, not even your own (the) question(s) dissolve(/s) in the wind of presence in this sense (inverse), why/cause = god appeal to meaning, transcendence, and human culture falls to its knees in any case, my pleasure, your presence http://www.asondheim.org/birthofcode.jpg in any case, your presence, my pleasure