(apologies for so much mail; see http://www.alansondheim.org/biog.txt for
what might pass for a psychopathological explanation)
Infinite
Goethe: "Whichever way you look at nature, it is the source of what is
infinite." (Maxims and Reflections 1409, trans. Stopp.)
Julu: Yes, but of course in Second Life, there is no nature; things can
only go so high.
Nikuko: Perhaps the idea is one of extrapolation, the asymptotic - one
imagines going higher, and this is always the case. (Of course there is
always dimensional collapse - the asymptotic grinding to a halt.)
Julu: Only to an extent - if nothing else the computer itself, client or
server, carries its own limitations, and these are intrinsic, inherent,
inherited.
Nikuko: This is responsible for what I consider the _compression_ of Sec-
ond Life - the uncanny sensation that everything, no matter how distant,
remains contained, closed in, closing in on itself, closing in on us,
users and avatars and observers, for that matter.
Julu: And contained along the axis of equivalence or equivalent substance
(shades of the analogic!), since it is all code, protocol, programming,
program dynamics; it is all of a one or a two, of a type - one might say,
following Kripke, of a _natural kind._
Nikuko: Yes, it is a digital substance or floating signifier - and a sub-
stance with malleable boundaries and internals, but one nonetheless having
a limit or limits, compression. This is easier to see - witness - than in
the physical world; inhabiting any virtual world, Second Life or other,
always has a sense of poverty to it. Where one invests is ultimately in
the language or culture - inscribing oneself in and out of it, so to
speak/write/rewrite/presence onself.
Julu: The compression extends metaphorically to a lack of atmosphere - for
that matter a lack of anything at all (shades of Nagarjuna!); what occurs,
rides on any number of machines and conduits. As if the world were vacuum
and emptied even of that.
Julu again: But it's this - I _sense_ it, this compression. In a way it
seems unnatural, but it's all we have within what is, one way or another,
a corroded, porous, and dynamic manifold. And it's suffocating.
Nikuko: It's suffocating and wounds; we live within a semantic manifold as
well, one of permanent wounding.
Julu: And this is what I meant by _flattening,_ the flat world -
Nikuko: - which extends, seeps out, from the virtual, back into what one
normally considers the real or Real (literally whatever, here); it is all
compressed -
Julu: - abjection and defuge at the heart of it.
Nikuko: However one might want to define heart - whatever it is or seems
to be, it's not infinite.
Julu: The idea of the 'true world' again, coming into play everywhere,
inscribed or uninscribed.
Nikuko: I can't breath...
Julu: Nor I...
http://www.alansondheim.org/smallgears1.jpg
http://www.alansondheim.org/smallgears2.jpg
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Odyssey/48/12/22
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:57:34 -0400
From: physnews@aip.org
To: sondheim@PANIX.COM
Subject: Physics News Update 871
INSIDE SCIENCE RESEARCH---PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Research News
Number 871 September 9, 2008 www.aip.org/pnu
by Phillip F. Schewe, James Dawson, and Jason S. Bardi
MINI BLACK HOLES NO DANGER. The Large Hadron Collider, the largest
and most expensive scientific instrument ever built in peacetime,
begins operations on September 10 when a beam of high-speed protons
begins shooting around the machine’s 16 mile (27 -kilometer)
circular tunnel beneath Geneva, Switzerland. When the protons
collide with each other inside the machine, one thing that
scientists are certain won’t happen is the production of miniature
black holes that gobble up nearby matter. A new study shows that
the continuing existence of old stars in the sky is evidence that
small black holes can’t swallow the Earth.
That is not to say that the new collider might not actually create
mini-black holes as no one knows for sure what will emerge from the
debris of the LHC collisions. Black holes are thought to represent
the ultimate state of compressed matter, with gravity so powerful
that any bit of matter, and even light, would be sucked inexorably
inwards with no chance for escape if it gets too close to the black
hole’s boundary.
That was the thinking about black holes before Stephen Hawking, the
Cambridge University scientist, came forth with the idea that even
black holes can lose energy. The density of energy inside a black
hole is so huge that some of it can be converted into creating new
particles, he said. If this conversion happens right at the edge of
the black hole, Hawking argued, some of those new particles could
escape, taking energy with them. In this way black holes can lose
energy. They can “evaporate.”
There is a rule in physics that says that the smaller the black
hole, the quicker the evaporation. For an LHC-style black hole,
estimated to be only a billionth of a billionth of a meter across
(an atto-meter) the black hole would exist for a bit more than a few
billion-billion-billionths of a second. It wouldn’t be around long
enough to swallow any nearby matter and would pose no danger to
ordinary matter.
But what if Hawking is wrong? What if some black holes don’t
evaporate, but go on eating matter? What if scientists create some
small, long-lasting black holes in Geneva, and they get loose? This
possibility is addressed in a new report in the journal Physical
Review D.
In their study of the matter, Steve Giddings of the University of
California at Santa Barbara and Michelangelo Mangano of CERN (the
parent laboratory where LHC operates) look at what happens if there
existed a type of black hole, one we'd be concerned about, that
could not only survive but continue to grow to a macroscopic size
(the size of a golf ball, say) in a time shorter than billions of
years.
If such a type of black hole existed, it would grow even quicker
inside super-compressed stars, such as white dwarfs and neutron
stars, where the density of matter is billions or trillions of times
greater then the density of rock on Earth. These celestial objects
are created when an ordinary star runs out of fuel and starts to
contract. There is no LHC on such stars but a black hole could
presumably be spawned when a passing cosmic ray, a haphazard
shooting particle that races around the cosmos, strikes and burrows
inside the neutron star.
Since astronomers look out and see lots of perfectly healthy and
very old white dwarfs and neutron stars of the right types, Giddings
concludes that quickly-growing black holes, the kind that
voraciously eat their surroundings, can't exist. Such a dangerous
black hole couldn't exist inside dense stars and couldn’t exist on
Earth.
Michael Peskin, a Stanford physicist who did not take part in the
study, says that the continued existence of superdense stars act
like the canaries that coal miners used to take underground-the idea
being that the presence of deadly gas would more quickly overcome
the canary, giving the miners warning of a dangerous condition. As
long as those stars keep sending their light, Peskin says, the Earth
is not in danger from black holes. (Link to Peskin comments, in
APS’s new “Physics” website at
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v1/14
)
If scientists don’t know for sure what particles the LHC will
produce, why build a massive, very expensive machine to smash
particles together in the first place? The smashing is needed
because to explore the interior of atoms and the power of the
collisions of particles is directly related to how deep inside the
researchers can see. Increasing the power of the proton beams used
in the collisions requires increasing the size of the collider.
Why do the beams have to be so powerful? The answer is related to
the idea that energy can be converted from one form into another.
The protons at the LHC whiz around their long track at a speed of
99.999999 % of the speed of light. Actually two beams circulate in
the same underground tunnel in opposite directions, and when two
protons hit each other head on, a lot of their immense energy of
motion can, at the moment of collision, be transformed into new
particles that weren’t there a moment before.
When two automobiles hit head-on the results are always bad. But in
the world of high-energy physics, instigating a violent smashup,
with lots of debris spraying out, is exactly what researchers want.
Among the debris can be particles that might have existed billions
of years ago but which, because of their instability, long ago
decayed away. Creating these rare particles again in a modern
experiment is precisely the plan at LHC. The thinking here is that
such formerly-extinct species of matter can tell us things about the
forces of nature.
***********
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE is a digest of physics news items arising
from physics meetings, physics journals, newspapers and
magazines, and other news sources. It is provided free of charge
as a way of broadly disseminating information about physics and
physicists. For that reason, you are free to post it, if you like,
where others can read it, providing only that you credit AIP.
Physics News Update appears approximately once a week.
AUTO-SUBSCRIPTION OR DELETION: By using the expression
"subscribe physnews" in your e-mail message, you
will have automatically added the address from which your
message was sent to the distribution list for Physics News Update.
If you use the "signoff physnews" expression in your e-mail message,
the address in your message header will be deleted from the
distribution list. Please send your message to:
listserv@listserv.aip.org
(Leave the "Subject:" line blank.)
Re: Lessons in Second Life - Some of you might be interested in a complex
installation I've been working on, modifying, for eleven weeks now - it's
called The Accidental Artist, and is in the Odyssey artspace in Second Life.
If you have an account, you can click on
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Odyssey/48/12/22
and it will take you there; if you don't have an account, it's easy enough
to get one.
The exhibition changes almost daily at this point, and is developing a kind
of liquid architecture within a space and physics treated as largely
malleable. I put up images from the various stages at
http://www.alansondheim.org/
and there are a series of texts, summarized to some extent in
http://www.alansondheim.org/sltheory.txt
that develop and describe the ideas behind the work. The full texts are at
http://www.alansondheim.org/ps.txt
http://www.alansondheim.org/pt.txt
http://www.alansondheim.org/pu.txt
Please note that not all of the URLs work, since I have to keep taking out
earlier images and videos as a result of limited bandwiddth.
Thanks,
Alan Sondheim
sondheim@panix.com
_______________________________________________
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list
is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
http://www.aoir.org/
