Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.00.1310112122380.29781@panix3.panix.com>
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
To: Cyb <cybermind@listserv.wvu.edu>, Wryting-L <WRYTING-L@listserv.wvu.edu>
Subject: PURITY
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 21:24:00 -0400 (EDT)
PURITY ___________ | ooo . | | ooo .o o| | ooo . o | | oo o. o| | ooo .o | | oooo. o| ___________ ___________ | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o. o | | oooo.o | | o . | | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | o . | | o o.oo | | o . | | o . | | o . | | oooo.o | | o. o | | oooo.o | | o . | | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | o . | | o o.oo | | oo o.ooo| | o . | | oo o.ooo| | oooo.o | | o. o | | oooo.o | | o . | | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | o . | | o o.oo | | o . | | oo o.ooo| | o . | | oooo.o | | o. o | | oooo.o | | o . | | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | o . | | oo o.ooo| | o o.oo | | o . | | o . | | oo o.ooo| | oooo.o | | o. o | | oooo.o | | o . | | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | o . | | o o.oo | | oo o.ooo| | o . | | o . | | oooo.o | | o. o | | oooo.o | | o . | | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | oo o.ooo| | o o.oo | | o . | | o . | | oo o.ooo| | oooo.o | | o. o | | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o oo.ooo| | o. o | ___________ How is PURITY produced? Like the ABSOLUTE it's dependent on human aura, cultural-linguistic concerns paralleling word- games in general. In this instance, PURITY creates a paper tape representation, which is then fed back into the paper tape program (ppt) to create a "cleansed" version of the same. Obviously this recursion could continue, each version longer and at greater "distance" from the generator. What is the point? That PURITY is inconceivable to the extent that it's conceivable, and that it may as well be confused with the ABSOLUTE: both engender similar forms of violence.