Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.11.1501232013240.19241@panix5.panix.com>
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
To: Cyb <cybermind@listserv.wvu.edu>, Wryting-L <WRYTING-L@listserv.wvu.edu>
Subject: Talk on Blank: Generation and Anguish (Feb. 6th, Brown, Granoff)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:16:10 -0500 (EST)
Talk on Blank: Generation and Anguish (Feb. 6th, Brown, Granoff) http://www.alansondheim.org/cthonic.png http://www.alansondheim.org/cairn130.jpg the relationship between blankness and anguish and anticipation in the face of annihilation Where is this taking us, in the future? What do you want to call this constitution you're making? any formation or constitution must be considered in relation to both sememe and grapheme and their dissolution. what is clear is that abjection - corrosion and decay - underlies everything here, that one can fall, only so far as the symbol; at that point anguish and violence occur. anguish as inconceivable, irrevocable; irrevocable: unable to be heard or understood, unable to participate in the semantic commons; dissolution of those commons; that we have already been undone; let that we that we have already been undone; be our primary descriptor: Well, any formation or constitution must be considered in relation to both sememe and grapheme and their dissolution. what is clear is that abjection - corrosion and decay - underlies everything here, that one can fall, only so far as the symbol; at that point anguish and violence occur. already constructs sedate trouble for us, subverting the categories we take for granted. Beyond the surface, any formation or constitution must be considered in relation to both sememe and grapheme and their dissolution. what is clear is that abjection - corrosion and decay - underlies everything here, that one can fall, only so far as the symbol; at that point anguish and violence occur. is -4699, wayward, yes? But what is that we have already been undone here, its type? Do you feel your gender is close to any formation or constitution must be considered in relation to both sememe and grapheme and their dissolution. what is clear is that abjection - corrosion and decay - underlies everything here, that one can fall, only so far as the symbol; at that point anguish and violence occur.? no, because gender or any binary continuum is already under the corrosive sign of capital collapse In any case, you must contact me about this... Deconstruction marginalizes our any formation or constitution must be considered in relation to both sememe and grapheme and their dissolution. what is clear is that abjection - corrosion and decay - underlies everything here, that one can fall, only so far as the symbol; at that point anguish and violence occur. -4699 here! anguish as inconceivable, irrevocable:irrevocable: unable to be heard or understood, unable to participate in the semantic commons:dissolution of those commons:that we have already been undone:any formation or constitution must be considered in relation to both sememe and grapheme and their dissolution. what is clear is that corrosion and decay - underlies everything here, that one can fall, only so far as the symbol; at that point anguish and violence occur.:yes:17664:4:the relationship between blankness and anguish and anticipation in the face of annihilation:any formation or constitution must be considered in relation to both sememe and grapheme and their dissolution. what is clear is that abjection - corrosion and decay - underlies everything here, that one can fall, only so far as the symbol; at that point anguish and violence occur.:that we have already been undone