Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.20.1607072259570.14754@panix3.panix.com>
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
To: Cyb <cybermind@listserv.wvu.edu>, Wryting-L <WRYTING-L@listserv.wvu.edu>
Subject: Inverse Dynamics Processing
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 23:01:38 -0400 (EDT)
Inverse Dynamics Processing http://www.alansondheim.org/bctrip2053.jpg http://www.alansondheim.org/morphism0.mp3 giraffe banjo http://www.alansondheim.org/morphism1.mp3 cifteli http://www.alansondheim.org/morphism2.mp3 giraffe banjo http://www.alansondheim.org/morphism3.mp3 echo harmonica instruments: http://www.alansondheim.org/bctrip2009.jpg cifteli http://www.alansondheim.org/bctrip2010.jpg giraffe banjo The process is irreversible, the morphisms non-abelian, although t -> -t -> t is reversible. The process also depends on hard-limiting, which transforms the input structure; the operation is two-staged: Think of the operations as a fundamental inversion of amplitude, a form of energy conversion, f(x) -> 1/x for example, x ranging between, say, (0,2). The practical result is the audibility of the surrounding environment and the player's body and play processes; the normative instrumental sound is backgrounded (what is taken as acceptable sound, as music, for example). (It feels like a form of channeling, an introjection of alien material in relation to a trialog among body, electronics, acoustic instruments. Or a projection of such sound. Or sound speaking through loud speakers. Or speakers channeling amplitude. Or speakers channeled. Or inversions of any of these.)
