The Alan Sondheim Mail Archive

July 20, 2017


over and over again.

1. found.
$ "I've had these moments" I've had these moments: not found
$ these moments these: not found
$ "these moments" these moments: not found
$ 2. 2.: not found

http://www.alansondheim.org/london0379.jpg
An old interview about LISTS and writing technique:
http://home.jps.net/~nada/sondheim.htm

Scalar value @noun[$non1] better written as $noun[$non1] at
a/parent line 45. Scalar value @adj[$pick] better written as
$adj[$pick] at a/parent line 62. Scalar value @adj[$pick] better
written as $adj[$pick] at a/parent line 65. Scalar value
@a[$gen1] better written as $a[$gen1] at a/parent line 73.
Scalar value @prep[$pre] better written as $prep[$pre] at
a/parent line 73. Scalar value @a[$gen] better written as
$a[$gen] at a/parent line 73. Scalar value @adj[$newpick] better
written as $adj[$newpick] at a/parent line 73. Scalar value
@noun[$non] better written as $noun[$non] at a/parent line 73.
Scalar value @a[10+$pre] better written as $a[10+$pre] at
a/parent line 93. Scalar value @a[15+$pre] better written as
$a[15+$pre] at a/parent line 94. Scalar value @a[$gen2] better
written as $a[$gen2] at a/parent line 107. Scalar value
@a[$gen3] better written as $a[$gen3] at a/parent line 107.

this might have been better written but old protocols die hard;
the hardest lesson I've learned is that refining myself is of no
use to anyone. So much for the brutal code of the somatic of the
body.

What might be better written becomes a mess as @ becomes $, a
signature of position becomes a value unsubstantiated but
universally agreed-on. I keep trying to write myself. I keep
trying to rite myself. I keep trying to wright myself. The small
flaw of the right.

To rite oneself: to encapsulate, contain, something about a
boundary dividing x from non-x but leaving out the striated
dynamics, I be destroyed.

Somewhere in here...
Somewhere in here...
something is is going on, something else is occurring.
Use of uninitialized value at a/parent line 68, <STDIN> chunk 6.

Some of that went into the LISTS. Some of that uselessly
continues. It might be better written as $. It might have been
better written as @. Honey, I'm FLYING BLIND here.

An old interview about LISTS and writing technique:
http://home.jps.net/~nada/sondheim.htm

Hold on right there! One second! Hi! What's your name?

Well, this might have been better written but old protocols die
hard; the hardest lesson I've learned is that refining myself is
of no use to anyone. So much for the brutal code of the somatic
of the body. , let's get started! Let's make a gender! That ok
with you?

Oh well, let's get going! Where is this taking us, in the
future?

What do you want to call this thing you're making?
Well, we're breathless.

Let Somewhere in here... be our primary descriptor!

Well, To rite oneself: to encapsulate, contain, something about
a boundary dividing x from non-x but leaving out the striated
dynamics, I be destroyed. already constructs splayed trouble
for us, subverting the categories we take for granted.

Beneath or within the surface, To rite oneself: to encapsulate,
contain, something about a boundary dividing x from non-x but
leaving out the striated dynamics, I be destroyed. is -5805,
poor, What might be better written becomes a mess as @ becomes
$, a signature of position becomes a value unsubstantiated but
universally agreed-on. I keep trying to write myself. I keep
trying to rite myself. I keep trying to right myself. The small
flaw of the right.? But what is Somewhere in here... here, its
being?

Do you feel your gender is close to To rite oneself: to
encapsulate, contain, something about a boundary dividing x from
non-x but leaving out the striated dynamics, I be destroyed.? In
any case, you must contact me about this...

Deconstruction marginalizes our To rite oneself: to encapsulate,
contain, something about a boundary dividing x from non-x but
leaving out the striated dynamics, I be destroyed. -5805 here!

I'm ill, in mourning, you're just working around nothing here.

Somewhere in here...:Somewhere in here...:something is is going
on, something else is occurring.:To rite oneself: to
encapsulate, contain, something about a boundary dividing x from
non-x but leaving out the striated dynamics, I be
destroyed.:What might be better written becomes a mess as @
becomes $, a signature of position becomes a value
unsubstantiated but universally agreed-on. I keep trying to
write myself. I keep trying to rite myself. I keep trying to
right myself. The small flaw of the right.:27524:4:this might
have been better written but old protocols die hard; the hardest
lesson I've learned is that refining myself is of no use to
anyone. So much for the brutal code of the somatic of the body.
:To rite oneself: to encapsulate, contain, something about a
boundary dividing x from non-x but leaving out the striated
dynamics, I be destroyed.:Somewhere in here...

http://home.jps.net/~nada/sondheim.htm the old interview again

Someone else among reiterations.

http://www.alansondheim.org/london0241.jpg
http://www.alansondheim.org/changes2.mp4

Somewhere in here...:Somewhere in here...:something is is going
on, something else is occurring.:To rite oneself: to encapsul-
ate, contain, something about a boundary dividing x from non-x
but leaving out the striated dynamics, U I be destroyed.:What
might be better written becomes a mess as @ becomes $, a
signature of position becomes a value unsubstantiated but
universally agreed-on. I keep trying to write myself. keep
trying _thus._ I make lists. I keep trying to right the world.

(Sweeping) There's nothing in here at all. We were mistaken. The
codes are somewhere else. I keep wondering about the biology of
bells. The only speak when tilted. What kind of an organism is
that?

(Cleaning) I'm desperate for your voice. Am I on the rite track?
Is there something else? What would Kant say? Nagle? Irigaray?
Are you there? For me, are you there? Just a word would do.

I keep trying to write the world. I keep trying to write myself.
I keep trying to rite myself. I keep trying to right myself. The
small flaw of the right.:27524:4:this might have been better
written but old protocols die hard; the hardest lesson I've
learned is that refining myself is of no use to anyone. So much
for the brutal code of the somatic of the body. :To rite
oneself: to encapsulate, contain, something about a boundary
dividing x from non-x but leaving out the striated dynamics, U I
be destroyed.:Somewhere in here...

(Showering) There's a home with the sound of the bells ringing
our home to us. I don't want to live in a world without trees or
cacti. Look, there's someone else.


Status:	Resolving address of alansondheim.org
Status:	Connecting to 208.76.80.46:21...
Status:	Connection established, waiting for welcome message...
Status:	Logged in
Status:	Retrieving directory listing of "/public_html"...
Status:	Directory listing of "/public_html" successful
Status:	Resolving address of alansondheim.org
Status:	Connecting to 208.76.80.46:21...
Status:	Connection established, waiting for welcome message...
Status:	Logged in
Status:	Starting upload of C:\Users\Alan\Desktop\london0241.jpg
Status:	File transfer successful, transferred 2,499,259 bytes
in 2 seconds
Status:	Retrieving directory listing of "/public_html"...
Status:	Directory listing of "/public_html" successful
Status:	Starting upload of C:\Users\Alan\Desktop\changes2.mp4
Status:	File transfer successful, transferred 20,006,274 bytes
in 18 seconds
Status:	Retrieving directory listing of "/public_html"...
Status:	Directory listing of "/public_html" successful

http://www.alansondheim.org/london0241.jpg

Generated by Mnemosyne 0.12.