Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.21.1804211902070.15608@panix3.panix.com>
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
To: Cyb <cybermind@listserv.wvu.edu>, Wryting-L <WRYTING-L@listserv.wvu.edu>
Subject: the ruins after the ruins / fissure ontology / note from the future
to the future -> Occupy ->
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 19:06:32 -0400 (EDT)
the ruins after the ruins / fissure ontology note from the future to the future -> Occupy -> http://www.alansondheim.org/ruined03.png https://youtu.be/L5t96F1je-w the ruins after the ruins http://www.alansondheim.org/ruined01.png http://www.alansondheim.org/ruined02.png http://www.alansondheim.org/ruined04.png http://www.alansondheim.org/ruined05.png http://www.alansondheim.org/ruined06.png http://www.alansondheim.org/ruined07.png http://www.alansondheim.org/ruined08.png ruins x, ontology x, flat ontology x, splatter semiotics x Well, what might be ok is ok here, there's only objects in the distance, fissures and from this viewpoint, everything is fissure, the same begetting the same, the flattening of inscription, inscription in turmoil relegated to a subcategory of epistemology, where the quantum characteristics are smeared across the real of this or any other world and, let's get started! Let's make a gender!! let's think of splatter semiotics, where everything local meets and the world struggles with inferential logics and the desire to live forever. let's think of ontology itself as corrosion, rust, smut, let's continue in our local neighborhood, break down the boundaries, think of everything we know. let's think of everything we know - Oh well, let's get going! It's impossible to decide on behavior! What do you want to call this thing you're making? what does it matter? what we call it today will be lost tomorrow, this text will be lost today, "never mind tomorrow" - calling is only a calling-forth in the local group, no one speaks babel-onian any more. or do they? Well, that this might be discoverable here, in this format, this note from the future to the future - already constructs trouble for us, subverting the categories we take for granted. Beneath the surface, that this might be discoverable here, in this format, this note from the future to the future - is 8595, neutral, other worlds in this regard, all of them, are irretrievable: the same broken from the same from the turmoil surrounding the truth, cosmology, and theorization of the big bang and its subsequent predecessors? But what is neutrality here, its constitution? Wait! that this might be discoverable here, in this format, this note from the future to the future - and 8595 are gone forever! Is it ever a question of numbers? Which imply -1 , 0, +1 and the like? somewhere, something arbitrary, Weyl called it the ego? that might be useful, some sense of a local corral, boundary, what we might called an inscription before that too fractures, dissolves, back to fissures, sinters - that process - that this might be discoverable here, in this format, this note from the future to the future -:other worlds in this regard, all of them, are irretrievable: the same broken from the same from the turmoil surrounding the truth, cosmology, and theorization of the big bang and its subsequent predecessors:1:what might be ok is ok here, there's only objects in the distance, fissures and from this viewpoint, everything is fissure, the same begetting the same, the flattening of inscription, inscription in turmoil relegated to a subcategory of epistemology, where the quantum characteristics are smeared across the real of this or any other world and:that this might be discoverable here, in this format, this note from the future to the future - in the sense of a repetition, the +1 marching forward, we'll take this space, Occupy, as if that were a possibility - that this might be discoverable here, in this format, this note from the future to the future -:other worlds in this regard, all of them, are irretrievable: the same broken from the same from the turmoil surrounding the truth, cosmology, and theorization of the big bang and its subsequent predecessors:1:what might be ok is ok here, there's only objects in the distance, fissures and from this viewpoint, everything is fissure, the same begetting the same, the flattening of inscription, inscription in turmoil relegated to a subcategory of epistemology, where the quantum characteristics are smeared across the real of this or any other world and:that this might be discoverable here, in this format, this note from the future to the future - this flat future, flat past; this incipient present, this present in the sense of a gift, neither a moment in time nor a moment in space, an engenderment, always already 86 perl a/gender.pl > kk 87 more kk 88 ls 89 more trace 90 rev trace >> kk 91 rev .trace >> kk 92 more enfolding 93 cp enfolding >> kk 94 cat enfolding >> kk enfolding scattering, the crease or ledge, the disappeared -> Occupy ->