The Alan Sondheim Mail Archive


Speaking Body / Internet Network Discourse

http://www.alansondheim.org/email1.jpg
http://www.alansondheim.org/email2.jpg
http://www.alansondheim.org/email3.jpg

>From sondheim@gmail.com Wed Aug  1 00:51:57 2018
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 00:51:23
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@gmail.com>
To: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
Subject: Txt

But let me consider this that this would be one way of
proceeding that is by talking from an application to the same
application creating a resonance which does not depend in any
way shape or form which does not depend on the exigencies of
writing but instead allows a flow or a current a kind of
recursion back into itself across the edges of the stream or
screen and that is what is occurring here this recursion or
resonance that is self applicable that goes nowhere except into
itself that reverberates. And then this fashion what can one say
but that which is in writing and what can one right but that
which is in sang so. It is the body at work here then in other
words it is the body which is constructing this not by virtue of
a series of symbols or the delay of writing but by the Eminence
of speaking and they're by Liza tail which is always told by the
body even in writing but with in writing or without writing it
exist as a subterfuge.


>From sondheim@gmail.com Wed Aug  1 00:54:13 2018
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 00:53:40
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@gmail.com>
To: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
Subject: Re: Txt

        [ The following text is in the "UTF-8" character set. ]
        [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
        [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Then there is always of course the matter of the reply of which
this is a constitution of which this is constituted of which
this appears above but should be placed below the text which is
the initial opening. So this another words is a portal into the
text but in the sense of a future interior since it precedes a
text only by virtue of convention and by the exigencies using
that word again by the existence he's of the application. The
software does this. Otherwise in this this follows the text much
as a follower or a Following comes afterwards always against or
within the grain or the seed of what preceded which was the
original received the Cora out of which this emerges. Out of
which this emerges.

[On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, 12:51 AM Alan Sondheim
<sondheim@gmail.com> wrote:
          But let me consider this that this would be one way of
          proceeding that is by talking from an application to the
          same application creating a resonance which does not
          depend in any way shape or form which does not depend on
          the exigencies of writing but instead allows a flow or a
          current a kind of recursion back into itself across the
          edges of the stream or screen and that is what is
          occurring here this recursion or resonance that is self
          applicable that goes nowhere except into itself that
          reverberates. And then this fashion what can one say but
          that which is in writing and what can one right but that
          which is in sang so. It is the body at work here then in
          other words it is the body which is constructing this not
          by virtue of a series of symbols or the delay of writing
          but by the Eminence of speaking and they're by Liza tail
          which is always told by the body even in writing but with
          in writing or without writing it exist as a subterfuge.]


>From sondheim@gmail.com Wed Aug  1 00:58:10 2018
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 00:57:37
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@gmail.com>
To: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
Subject: Re: Txt

        [ The following text is in the "UTF-8" character set. ]
        [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
        [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Finally of course there is the Koda not the Cora which precedes
out of which all of this scattered information the scattered
philosophy of particles comes from but first or last rather
there is this the Koda which is kind of a receptacle like the
Cora was in which all of the rest of this might be placed so
what is the ladder in time then resonates reverberates with the
origin displacing the origin to become the origin itself as in
oh so that's what you were trying to say or these were the last
words I heard him say or any form of epitaph. So then this is a
following or a follower of which we have spoken before all of
this within the same as if it were appearing the same and
simultaneous software which it is not of course these being
layers upon layers. So that this is the breathing of a body into
the text and the ending of the text by the breathing of the body
by the car tailing of the breath by the curtailing of the
speaking of the body Beyond differance. So to repeat or to
adhere this is that of the theater within which the audience is
locked either within or without and it makes no difference. It
is a very active the divisibility. That makes innocence for this
as a receptacle that makes sense for this as a receptacle. That
makes any sense for this as a receptacle. That makes in a sense
for this to be a receptacle. This is the quora and this is the
day Newmont.

[On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, 12:51 AM Alan Sondheim
<sondheim@gmail.com> wrote:
          But let me consider this that this would be one way of
          proceeding that is by talking from an application to the
          same application creating a resonance which does not
          depend in any way shape or form which does not depend on
          the exigencies of writing but instead allows a flow or a
          current a kind of recursion back into itself across the
          edges of the stream or screen and that is what is
          occurring here this recursion or resonance that is self
          applicable that goes nowhere except into itself that
          reverberates. And then this fashion what can one say but
          that which is in writing and what can one right but that
          which is in sang so. It is the body at work here then in
          other words it is the body which is constructing this not
          by virtue of a series of symbols or the delay of writing
          but by the Eminence of speaking and they're by Liza tail
          which is always told by the body even in writing but with
          in writing or without writing it exist as a subterfuge.]


Wed Aug  1 12:19:37 EDT 2018

Generated by Mnemosyne 0.12.